Presidency Voting and Court Acquitting in both: About you love and you can't?

This is about "president voting" and lawsuit to allowed "equal acquitting" both parties'.

Impeachment group and president's team are different causes entities, they fight for on representing the party a leading right to lead the country, for personal, the former is for against, the later is for promote. We know the leading party now is republican and their slogan is "prosperity of country," and the other party is claiming a replace strategy and also pushing for switch leadership in their hands. You know people have tendencies, but in this case, if nobody has the tendency to vote, then it is impossible to establish a party lead for this country. So what makes the people in the middle stagnant?

The reason I think, first not very sensible to see that a party already beaten to fight back for keeping themselves on voting states and the winning party does not have guarantee of leading for sure. So this is insecurity, is our country going to end in a team's winner or it will go down because someone is right?

Second I think the direct causing factor is president's clothes, for my seeing it, the clothes it's like a bandwagon or showing logo for a person being called president, you definitely will go see brand Alama instead of seeing like sorsya as the suit of president can carry. So it must be something called, you can't do it, but you should do something useful to help or else let's go different in our roads. There must be some economical like reasons to disparate two parties leadership. So I don't think these two parties diverts because of ideology or thinking ideology to make them separate, but however can be the reason of another kind like we are running a team. As for the reason why people stagnant in a middle can be like this, a distraction information or the appearance from those two separate teams are giving people an impression of they don't get along, so that is the end of it for argument, but through clarifying the difference causation element to cause a disparage can help people to know: wow, yea, our country is a place that people are arguing but not a place our only president is under attack by substitute selection team for helping us to replace a one position presidency.

So to sum up, first the stagnant of people lies on the reason of the regime of a country is not lead by one single common knowledge, or ideal, but it is just can not be only one person there, and other people wanting to replace the one. there is no target because the country is so, and there is no replacement because the country, again, never want to be led by singularity polar.

It feels like two polars, but actually it is better because the federalism. The state is the why question focused lives and living status for each every one, but I just feel very not so comfortable if there are still a lot of people there reluctant in heart that they don't quite want something, that can be the failure of leading.

So we know the leader doesn't go for a supremacy, and the president is not going to lead by his will or arbitration, that means we have two parties, and it is the corner stone of a really interesting not tyrannical country of federal union of states beings. So it is a phenomenon, people should know a knowledge that a country does not need a leader's difference with the fact, why it is should be president, but not Donald Trump.

And, what the impeachment team is doing is for their presidency about somebody else, and this is a democrats career disparate than the republican's already there presidency of Trump, it can be just a voting process, they use an intertwining way to try to practice the country's need. And in fact, the two parities have very big difference, one is for the weak, one is for elite. I don't think the common sense of a country and the loving heart of people will fail each other, but sometimes it just appears to be "president didn't suit in their clothes" thing, to make the issue too complex and missing in points.

Again, this is important, whose clothes to put for president, but when they can do it like this, they are the leader.

I am thinking of married couple, they have common shared ideology that the wife can put THE clothes to the president husband also, but an impeachment can not like that, because they are democrats.

So to fight is a destined choice from each party, and it is as usual as not happening things like this, but happen something like "my wife gives me a suit".

Whether you love it, or you are democrats, you can still thinking about this country, or nation, what kind of paradigm about crowning someone a right to represent people and its force. So you just put your vote to an agent, but not like to support one up to be a fanciful leader of a country sometimes they come form separate parties.

To give a round up, pattern of this state is accept two parties existence for each along, and there is impossible for a people or president to lord as just one, or act just because of the supreme right from law.

The constitution just give the American States a president for limited power, so it is an important sign; also the administrating congress does not admit the president action is like from personal but it represents, and this is a common sense.

So either the impeachment team or the president team won't attack the being of the other side, neither they will stress their advantages of being a leading one. The people should vote for, to put a vote to the president candidates and again the now situation is a obstacle for make the civil citizen comfortable about his country. So I suggest slogan saying about the facts of being presidency achieved lord country has a system of legal reason from texts. And this is very clear in each state, and every state will vote for the state of American continents. So go law, go vote, that can be the right proceeding method to resolve the stagnation from people. who doesn't quite know if I vote for a country or I should select a representative talker? My idea is go law, you will know the two parties separate and they are natural causation to be two teams; second by vote, you has an ideal American country that in a better process to keep practicing presidency, it is a custom, thus after voting you will learn that vote is a very direct way to keep a state running, and betterment.

Therefore, the people has functioning element when they join the actions, through voting, keep states; through law in generic commonness, they will find a prosper way to develop. Actually it is a revolutionary force to keep a country going on, instead of not clear about this mechanism: that a two parties system is a metaphor of no single one person can control all the issues or decide all issues about America, it is not important but it is a dead truth. So you just vote for keep a presidency system running, and through law about equal acquitting can work.